Page 7 - Demo

7BIENESTAR ANIMALKendall, H., L. Lobao and J. Sharp. 2006. “Public concern with animal well-being: place, social structural location, and individual experience.” Rural Sociology 71 (3): 399-428.Krohn, C. C. 2001. Effects of different suckling systems on milk production, udder health, reproduction, calf growth and some behavioural aspects in high producing dairy cows—a review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 72(3), 271-280.Metz, J., Metz, J. H. M. 1986. Maternal influence on defecation and urination in the newborn calf. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 16(4), 325-333.Rushen, J., De Passillé, A. M., Keyserlingk, M. A., Weary, D. M. 2007. The welfare of cattle (Vol. 5). Springer Science & Business Media.Te Velde, H., Aarts, N., Van Woerkum, C. 2002. Dealing with ambivalence: farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. Journal of agricultural and environmental ethics, 15(2), 203-219.Vanhonacker, F., W. Verbeke, E. Van Poucke, F.A. Tuyttens. 2007. Segmentation based on consumers’ perceived importance and attitude toward farm animal welfare Int. J. Soc. Food Agric., 15 (2007), pp. 91-101.Vanhonacker, F., W. Verbeke, E. Van Poucke and F. Tuyttens. 2008. “Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently?” Livestock Science, 116, pp. 126-136.Ventura, B. A., Von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Schuppli, C. A., Weary, D. M. 2013. Views on contentious practices in dairy farming: The case of early cow-calf separation. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(9), 6105-6116.Von Keyserlingk, M.A., J. Rushen, A.M. de Passillé, D.M. Weary. Invited revie The welfare of dairy cattle—Key concepts and the role of science. J. Dairy Sci., 92 (2009), pp. 4101-4111